Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Did Job’s Wife really say to the Prophet: ‘Curse God and die’? Part Three. The Testament of Job.








by

 Damien F. Mackey


  


 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

The Testament of Job is thought to have been written somewhere between the C1st BC and the C1st AD. It adds details not to be found in the biblical Book of Job, such as the spectacular one that Job was a veritable king of Egypt.

 

Importantly, for this study, the Testament of Job gives more prominence to Job’s wife, even providing her with a personal name – a detail missing from the Book of Job. And that name is, as it happens, cognate with “Sarah”, the name of Job’s wife (see my Part Two).

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  


Prologue


 


To the reader who wrote the following, recalling an alternative (for Job as Jobab of Genesis) to my thesis that the prophet Job was Tobias, son of Tobit:


 


Hi Damien, while I find this topic intriguing, I am finding difficulty in linking Tobias whose father was Tobit and his mother was Anna (apparently), but there is no indication of Job(Tobias) sons. I am at the moment trying to find a genealogical path to Sarah. So far her father was Reuel(Raguel) and mother was Edna.


….


what do you say concerning Gen 36.33. It does not explicitly describe the genealogy of Jobab as Job. However, his lineage can be traced through his father Zare (Gen 36:33), whom the Edomite genealogy identifies as a son of Raguel (Gen 36:16–17), one of the sons of Esau by Ishmael’s daughter Basemath (Gen 36:10). …. [,]


 


I replied in favour of my view for Job’s having lived at a time much later than Jobab’s:


 


…. Names get duplicated. For example, the geographical names in the Book of Job, usually attributed to Edom, can also be found in the region of Bashan where I locate Job. I noted this fact in “Job’s Life and Times” [https://www.academia.edu/3787850/Jobs_Life_and_Times]. …. If you carefully read [this article], you will see from that quote of Delitzsch that the type of fertile farmland that the Book of Job attributes to Job can by no means be located in sterile Edom. But it does fit Bashan, where Arabic traditions place the home of Job – and so do I. The Book of Job is closest in style and content to Jeremiah (and Lamentations), sometimes almost word for word with Jeremiah (who, I have suggested, may have been young Elihu of the Book of Job). It clearly belongs to the c. C7th BC. Also, the mention of a squadron of Chaldeans is fitting in that late era, but not at all in the era of Jobab of Genesis.


….


Added to all that, the mention of the Adversary “Satan” seems to be a late concept, also occurring in Zechariah 3:1. And C. Seow has described the Book of Tobit as being the “most substantial early influence” on the Book of Job, see: http://bookofjob-amaic.blogspot.com.au/2015/04/book-of-tobit-is-most-substantial-early.html


That is most fitting if Job was the son of Tobit, as I am arguing. ….


 


[End of e-mails]


 


The Testament of Job


 


According to this late apocryphal document we learn that Job’s wife of his sufferings - i.e., the wife whom we had encountered most fleetingly in the Book of Job - was named Sitis. The Jewish Encyclopedia article on the subject thus summarises the rôle of this Sitis in the tale (http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/8694-job-testament-of):


 


For seven years (48 years; Paris MS.) [Job] sat on a dunghill outside of the city, while his wife, Sitis, who had been brought up in royal luxury, served as water-carrier to win bread for herself and him. Afterward (after 15 years; Paris MS.), when she was no longer allowed to take him bread, Satan, disguised as a bread-seller, went to meet her, asking, as the price of three loaves of bread for her starving husband, for the hair on her head; to save her husband from famishing, she consented (comp. Shab. 59a; Akiba's wife). At last, when under the influence of Satan, her patience gave way, and in an impassioned appeal, full of pathos (contrasting her former riches and glory with her present state of gloom and poverty) and poetic grandeur, she called upon Job to curse God and die (comp. LXX. Job ii. 9). Job, however, indignantly rebuked her and challenged Satan, who had been hidden behind her all this while, saying: "Only a coward fights with frail woman; come forth and wage war with me!" Then Satan broke forth into tears, and said, "I yield to thee who art the great wrestler," and left him, abashed (ch. iii.-vi., ed. Kohler; ix.-xxvii., ed. James; comp. B. B. 16a: "The grief of Satan was greater than that of Job"). As to Job, the great "athlete" or "wrestler," see IV Macc. vi. 10, xvii. 15-16; and Philo [where Job is frequently characterized as such; comp. Heb. x. 32. ….


[End of quote]


 


According to my Part One of this series, Job’s wife had intended in 2:9 for her husband, not “to curse God and die”, as according to the Testament of Job above, but to “bless God and die”.


But the special jewel that I draw from The Testament of Job is that the name here attributed to Job’s wife, Sitis (var. Siti, Sitidos), has the Arabic meaning of “Lady” (سيتي).


And so with the name, “Sarah” (שָׂרָה) (http://finejudaica.com/pages/hebrew_names.htm): “Hebrew name meaning “noble lady, princess”.


 


So, possibly, the Testament of Job has preserved, in the Arabic name Siti[s], meaning “Lady”, the actual name of Job’s much tested wife, Sarah, meaning “Lady”.   


 

Monday, April 27, 2015

Book of Tobit is the "most substantial early influence" on the Book of of Job

Image result for tobit

Taken from:

C.L. Seow
Job 1-21
Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2013.

P. 115

C. Tobit
 
While OG [Old Greek] has the distinction of being the first sustained reading of Job, pride of place in terms of the book's most substantial early influence must go to the book of Tobit. .... The affinities between Tobit and Job are clear: Both are men of piety and charity (Job 1:1-5; 29:12-17; Tob 1:3; 8, 17). Both lose their possessions and otherwise suffer, but not because of their sinfulness. In fact, in the case of Tobit, suffering came precisely because he had been pious. Both are confronted by their wives (Job 2:9; Tob 2:14). Just as Job says he prefers strangulation and death and loathes his life because of his unbearable suffering (Job 7:15), so Tobit says he prefers death to the excessive distress in his life (Tob 3:6). The implicit connection to Job is made explicit in Vulg (Tob 2:12-18), where Tobit's trial is said to have been permitted in order that an example might be set for posterity "as also of holy Job". ....
 
Like Job, Tobit addresses the issue of suffering that cannot be attributed to human sin. Yet, whereas Job of the canonical Hebrew version is of uncertain ethnic origin, coming as he does from the land of Uz in the Transjordan, Tobit is clearly a Jew [actually a Naphtalian Israelite]. Tobit suffers a fate very similar to Job's. If there is any doubt about the applicability for the Jews of the story of the suffering of the pious Job, possibly a Gentile [sic], in Tobit they must have found a Jewish counterpart to the possibly-Gentile Job. Moreover, whereas the character of God remains an open question in the book of Job, the protagonist having so vehemently raised the question of divine justice, the goodness of God is a given in Tobit. ....
 
 
AMAIC comment: The reason for the startling likeness between the books of Tobit and Job becomes abundantly clear at this site, where Tobias, son of Tobit, is actually identified with Job.

Book Notice: C.L. Seow on Job 1-21

Image result for job and friends

C.L. Seow
Job 1-21
Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2013.
Available at Amazon.com

In the inaugural volume of Eerdmans’ Illuminations series, C. L. Seow offers an impressive introduction to Job and a commentary on its first half (chapters 1–21). Reading through sections of Job 1–21: Interpretation and Commentary reminded me of why Seow’s commentary on Ecclesiastes (Anchor Bible) is at the top of my list for that book. He has the unique ability to concisely discuss and evaluate complex topics and textual problems, while providing helpful paths forward for literary and theological readings of biblical books in their final form.
The commentary opens with a 248 page introduction. This is not a typo—248 pages! The first 108 pages deal with typical topics: texts and versions, language, integrity, provenance, setting, genres, structure, artistry, and theology. The remainder of the introduction traces responses to Job in Jewish, Christian, and Muslim traditions. While a 248 page introduction may lead some weary readers to ask Job-like questions, we must remember the remarkable amount of toil Seow has exerted to produce such a clear and thorough introduction. Besides, a commentary is a reference volume; this means you can pick what you want to read. While specialists in wisdom literature will surely devour it in its entirety, those primarily interested in reading Job as a literary whole and in the book’s theology will find Seow’s discussions of Job’s integrity, structure, and theology sufficient and stimulating.
Approaching Job as a strategic and coherent composition, Seow’s understanding of the book begins with the prose prologue (Job 1–2). These chapters depict two rounds of divine council gatherings (1:6; 2:1) followed by tests against Job to expose whether Job will curse God to his face (1:11; 2:9). Though Job blesses God (1:21) and does not sin (2:10), the gathering of Job’s friends at the conclusion of the prologue creates a context for a “third test” in the poetic portion of the book: will Job continue to bless God amongst his friends? The poetic section of the book begins with Job cursing his birth. This leads to dialogue that starts out with two symmetrical cycles that show Job’s daring statements toward God about his plight and his friends’ insistence that Job’s suffering has to be related to sin and its consequences (4–14; 15–21). By the third cycle, Eliphaz is not measured in his speech (22), Job offers a mocking response (23–24), Bildad can only stammer a few words (25), and Zophar is so stunned that he does not speak. This disintegration in the dialogue leads Job into a monologue where he claims that wisdom is inaccessible and wishes for a hearing with God (26–31). In response to Job and his friends, Elihu is a Daniel or Joseph-like figure who embodies his message that God’s wisdom can come through an intermediary (32–37). Elihu’s speech prepares the way for YHWH’s unmediated revelation which conveys that God’s counsel and judgments are beyond human comprehension, causing Job to confess his lack of knowledge (38:1–42:6). The prose epilogue (42:7–17) closes the book by affirming that Job has spoken rightly (even if his speech at times borders on blasphemy), though a shroud of mystery lingers. The theology of Job then affirms extreme lament, God’s freedom, and the need to acknowledge that individual cases of suffering can be inexplicable in light of God’s inscrutable counsel and justice.
As for the commentary, each chapter of Job is treated in five sections: translation, interpretation, retrospect, technical comments on words, phrases, and clauses (“commentary”), and a bibliography. There are images of Job in art history and excurses on the history of interpretation scattered throughout. I’ll offer two responses to this portion of Job 1–21. First, since many commentaries force readers to wade through mounds of technical details to decipher the flow of thought in the passage being suggested by the commentator, the “interpretation” and “retrospect” sections helpfully trace and explain the unfolding message for each chapter in light of the context of the book. Those in ministry will appreciate this part of the commentary. Second, for biblical scholars, Seow’s technical comments prove illuminating, though the way they are set out is frustrating. Let me illustrate with the following example from Job 1:1.
whose name was Job. The standard formula for the introduction of an individual is with the circumstantial clause ûšĕmô PN, lit., “and his name (was). . . .” …. When the order is reversed, as it is here (i.e., PN šĕmô), an emphasis on the name is sometimes intended, perhaps an emphasis on its significance …
While the point Seow goes on to make about the significance of the meaning of Job is insightful, it would be helpful to know the Hebrew order from the start: ’iyyōb šĕmô. Since the comments at times assume knowledge of Hebrew and that a reader has a Hebrew Bible open, I wonder why Hebrew characters are not used; why transliterate? I personally wonder whether a person who would put in the effort required to read the technical comments has also put in the minimal effort needed to learn the Hebrew alphabet. This may be my own bias, however, for enjoying commentaries that use Hebrew characters rather than transliteration.
Overall, Seow’s commentary is a masterful resource that a wide range of people can benefit from—ministers and scholars alike. It is highly recommended. I look forward to the rest of the series. One problem with writing a commentary that has parts accessible to specialists and non-specialists is its size, which impacts the cost of the commentary ($95). I suggest that the publisher considers offering a condensed version for those in ministry with select sections of the introduction (integrity, structure, and theology) and of the commentary (translation, interpretation, and retrospect). This would allow those for whom $95 is prohibitive to benefit from the riches of this commentary.

Andrew T. Abernethy
Lecturer in Old Testament
Ridley Melbourne Mission and Ministry College


Read more: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/euangelion/2013/10/c-l-seow-on-job-1-21/#ixzz3YYWXOtRu

Thursday, April 23, 2015

A Brilliant Explanation of the Problematical Job 42:7-8



Image result for god from whirlwind job




Taken from article:






The Character of God in the Book of Job (Hebrew)



....


The Speech about God in Job 42:7–8A Contribution to the Coherence of the Book of Job


....
All of this is quite similar to what we find in the book of Job. Here, too, God appears out of the tempest and acts as judge. Here, too, he addresses two distinct parties. He first turns to Job, his loyal servant, and reprimands him for his failings. Then he turns to Job’s friends, expresses his anger at them, and declares them guilty of evil speech against their innocent friend. Here, too, the ones found guilty of evil speech against their fellow are threatened with severe divine punishment.

....


Read entire article.