Monday, June 15, 2026

Playful archangel Raphael too clever for humans and demons

 


 

by

 Damien F. Mackey

  

The subtle angel may also have had modern biblical exegetes well in mind when,

in answer to the question of Tobias: ‘Can you go with me to Rages in Media?

Are you acquainted with that region?’ The angel replied, ‘I will go with you;

I am familiar with the way …’. (Tobit 5:5-6).

 

The archangel Raphael appears in the form of a young man when Tobias is looking for someone to guide him to the land of Media at his father Tobit’s request (Tobit 5:3-8):

 

Then Tobit gave [Tobias] the receipt, and said to him, ‘Find a man to go with you and I will pay him wages as long as I live; and go and get the money’. So he went to look for a man; and he found Raphael, who was an angel, but Tobias did not know it. Tobias said to him, ‘Can you go with me to Rages in Media? Are you acquainted with that region?’ The angel replied, ‘I will go with you; I am familiar with the way, and I have stayed with our brother Gabael’. Then Tobias said to him, ‘Wait for me, and I shall tell my father’. And he said to him, ‘Go, and do not delay’. So he went in and said to his father, ‘I have found some one to go with me’. He said, ‘Call him to me, so that I may learn to what tribe he belongs, and whether he is a reliable man to go with you’.

 

The ancient Greeks enjoyed this colourful incident so much that they absorbed it into The Odyssey, with Telemachus taking the place of Tobias and the disguised archangel, Raphael, being replaced by, not surprisingly, a Greek deity, in this case the goddess Athena disguised as the young man, Mentes.

 

Mentes (King of the Taphians) - Wikipedia

“In Book I, the Goddess Athena disguises herself as Mentes, an old family friend of Odysseus, when she goes to visit his son, Telemachus. Athena, disguised as him, tells Telemachus that he is sailing to the city of Temese with his own crew, claiming that he is in search of bronze. …. Although Mentes had hardly any appearances in Greek myths of earlier antiquity, he became a symbol of a guardian and a mentor. …”.

 

While Raphael will help Tobias get the money (silver), Mentes “is in search of bronze”.

 

Tobit, old and presently blind, will be no match for the tricky Raphael when Tobit attempts to learn the young man’s name and origins (vv. 9-15):

 

So Tobias invited him in; he entered and they greeted each other. Then Tobit said to him, ‘My brother, to what tribe and family do you belong? Tell me’. But he answered, ‘Are you looking for a tribe and a family or for a man whom you will pay to go with your son?’ And Tobit said to him, ‘I should like to know, my brother, your people and your name’. He replied, ‘I am Azarias the son of the great Ananias, one of your relatives’. Then Tobit said to him, ‘You are welcome, my brother. Do not be angry with me because I tried to learn your tribe and family. You are a relative of mine, of a good and noble lineage. For I used to know Ananias and Jathan, the sons of the great Shemaiah, when we went together to Jerusalem to worship and offered the first-born of our flocks and the tithes of our produce. They did not go astray in the error of our brethren. My brother, you come of good stock. But tell me, what wages am I to pay you—a drachma a day, and expenses for yourself as for my son? 

 

And besides, I will add to your wages if you both return safe and sound’. So they agreed to these terms.

 

Surely, this must be the same elusive being as the mysterious one, “the man”, with whom the patriarch Jacob had wrestled and had hoped to wrest from him his identity – but to no avail (Genesis 32:24-29):

 

So Jacob was left alone, and a man wrestled with him till daybreak. When the man saw that he could not overpower him, he touched the socket of Jacob’s hip so that his hip was wrenched as he wrestled with the man. Then the man said, ‘Let me go, for it is daybreak’.

But Jacob replied, ‘I will not let you go unless you bless me’.

The man asked him, ‘What is your name?’

‘Jacob’, he answered.

Then the man said, ‘Your name will no longer be Jacob, but Israel, because you have struggled with God and with humans and have overcome’.

Jacob said, ‘Please tell me your name’.

But he replied, ‘Why do you ask my name?’ Then he blessed him there.

 

Compare:

 

‘Please tell me your name’. (Genesis)

‘I should like to know, my brother, your people and your name’. (Tobit)

 

Jacob’s (and Tobit’s) question: ‘Please tell me your name’, like another ancient question, this time from Jacob’s father, Isaac, ‘Where is the lamb?’ (Genesis 22:7), will resound down through the centuries, until being definitively answered.

For, the angel Raphael will, late in the Book of Tobit, reveal his true identity (12:15): ‘ I am Raphael, one of the seven holy angels who present the prayers of the saints and enter into the presence of the glory of the Holy One’.

 

And Isaac’s question will be answered only upon the arrival of the Messiah whom Isaac had foreshadowed, when the Baptist declared: ‘Behold, the Lamb of God!’ (John 1:29).

 

The archangel had brilliantly chosen an identity that was both accurate in its meaning, and one that lulled Tobit into thinking that he was a relative from a good family.  

 

Likewise, in The Odyssey, the goddess Athena will portray herself as a family friend. For, as we read above: “… the Goddess Athena disguises herself as Mentes, an old family friend of Odysseus, when she goes to visit his son, Telemachus”.

 

Chris Cammarata has well explained the archangel Raphael’s resorting to subterfuge:

 

In the Book of Tobit, angel Raphael pretends he is Azariah, the son of Hananiah the elder. Why did the Angel lie? Isn’t it a sin to lie? – Catholic Café

 

In the Book of Tobit, angel Raphael pretends he is Azariah, the son of Hananiah the elder. Why did the Angel lie? Isn’t it a sin to lie?

 

It is a sin to lie, but the angel isn’t exactly lying. In this situation it’s more like he isn’t revealing the whole truth–at least not yet.

 

The nature of St. Raphael’s mission required that he keep his angelic identity hidden. Other angels in the Old Testament did this as well. Angels are fearful, powerful, and glorious creatures–that’s why they often begin their messages with “do not be afraid!” Masking their angelic nature serves a practical purpose–and it also emphasizes that God is the one who deserves the glory, not the angel.

 

The reason St. Raphael gives the name Azariah to Tobit in the first place is because he urges the angel to tell him where he is from.  So Raphael gets around it with a funny trick: he gives Tobit and Tobiah the name “Azariah, son of Hananiah.” The name Azariah means “God has helped” and Hananiah means “God has shown mercy.” So basically Raphael is disguising his identity while at the same time secretly hinting at it–his whole mission, as revealed at the end of the story, began because Raphael brought their family’s prayer before the Lord and so was sent to help them (see Tobit 12:11-20). He calls himself a “kinsman” and an “Israelite” as a way of showing that they belong to the same spiritual family–the people of God.

 

So you can sort of think of Azariah as the angel’s “codename” for the mission!

 

And just to clear up any confusion on lying, the Catechism notes that “the right to the communication of the truth is not unconditional” (CCC 2488). We have to judge in particular situations whether it is the right time and circumstance to reveal the truth. Being truthful requires prudence, too. Also, “no one is bound to reveal the truth to someone who does not have the right to know it” (CCC 2489). In the case of St. Raphael, Tobit and his family didn’t have the right to know his true identity–but in the end, he reveals it to them to “declare the works of God with due honor” (Tobit 12:11).The irony in the story of Tobit is that when St. Raphael first enters Tobit’s house and greets him, he tells him: “Take courage! God’s healing is near; so take courage” (Tobit 5:10). What does the name Raphael mean? “God’s healing” (or “God heals”)!

 

More angelic tricks

 

And Raphael, having revealed his name, lets slip another secret.

He was not actually eating, as he had appeared to be, when he was Tobit’s family (12:19): “All these days I merely appeared to you and did not eat or drink, but you were seeing a vision”.

 

Early during their trek to the land of Media, at the River Tigris, the angel will have to intervene to save Tobias from being devoured by a fish (6:1-3):

 

Now as they proceeded on their way they came at evening to the Tigris river and camped there. Then the young man went down to wash himself. A fish leaped up from the river and would have swallowed the young man; and the angel said to him, ‘Catch the fish’. So the young man seized the fish and threw it up on the land.

 

In this incident, the brilliant archangel will demonstrate his breadth of knowledge of God’s created world, of the healing properties of vital parts of a fish, of demonology and exorcism: (vv. 4-8):

 

Then the angel said to him, ‘Cut open the fish and take the heart and liver and gall and put them away safely’. So the young man did as the angel told him; and they roasted and ate the fish.

And they both continued on their way until they came near to Ecbatana. 

 

Then the young man said to the angel, ‘Brother Azarias, of what use is the liver and heart and gall of the fish?’ He replied, ‘As for the heart and the liver, if a demon or evil spirit gives trouble to any one, you make a smoke from these before the man or woman, and that person will never be troubled again. And as for the gall, anoint with it a man who has white films in his eyes, and he will be cured’.

 

Young Tobias was in the care of a very astute travelling guide.

 

The subtle angel may also have had modern biblical exegetes well in mind when, in answer to the question of Tobias: ‘Can you go with me to Rages in Media? Are you acquainted with that region?’ The angel replied, ‘I will go with you; I am familiar with the way …’. (5:5-6).

For, according to Fr. D. Dumm, writing on “Tobit” for The Jerome Biblical Commentary, the angel was confused about the way, leading Tobias in the wrong direction: “[The angel] Raphael knows the journey of life far better than the route to Media!” But, unlike our ignorant generation, the archangel well knew that the land of Media was situated to the west, not to the east of Nineveh - a fact that Richard Erickson has recently demonstrated (2020) quite independently of the Book of Tobit:

 

A PROBLEM IN CHALDAEAN AND ELAMITE GEOGRAPHY

 

(5) A PROBLEM IN CHALDAEAN AND ELAMITE GEOGRAPHY

 

More angelic subtlety

 

As the travellers neared Ecbatana in Media, Raphael informs Tobias about the “beautiful and sensible” Sarah, his future wife (6:9-12):

 

When they approached Ecbatana, the angel said to the young man, ‘Brother, today we shall stay with Raguel. He is your relative, and he has an only daughter named Sarah. I will suggest that she be given to you in marriage, because you are entitled to her and to her inheritance, for you are her only eligible kinsman. The girl is also beautiful and sensible. Now listen to my plan. I will speak to her father, and as soon as we return from Rages we will celebrate the marriage. For I know that Raguel, according to the Law of Moses, cannot give her to another man without incurring the penalty of death, because you rather than any other man are entitled to the inheritance’.

 

Tobias, however, knowing that Sarah has been tormented by a demon who had already killed her previous seven husbands, is none too keen about this proposal (vv. 13-14):

 

Then the young man said to the angel, ‘Brother Azarias, I have heard that the girl has been given to seven husbands and that each died in the bridal chamber. Now I am the only son my father has, and I am afraid that if I go in I will die as those before me did, for a demon is in love with her, and he harms no one except those who approach her. So now I fear that I may die and bring the lives of my father and mother to the grave in sorrow on my account. And they have no other son to bury them’.

 

The resourceful angel, though, had already made preparations for this very situation (vv. 15-17):

 

But the angel said to him, ‘Do you not remember the words with which your father commanded you to take a wife from among your own people?

Now listen to me, brother, for she will become your wife; and do not worry about the demon, for this very night she will be given to you in marriage. When you enter the bridal chamber, you shall take live ashes of incense and lay upon them some of the heart and liver of the fish so as to make a smoke. Then the demon will smell it and flee away, and will never again return. And when you approach her, rise up, both of you, and cry out to the merciful God, and he will save you and have mercy on you. Do not be afraid, for she was destined for you from eternity. You will save her, and she will go with you, and I suppose that you will have children by her’. When Tobias heard these things, he fell in love with her and yearned deeply for her.

 

All went according to plan. Tobias and Sarah become happily married, and Asmodeus, “the worst of demons”, was bound by the archangel (8:3): “And when the demon smelled the odor he fled to the remotest parts of Egypt, and the angel bound him”.

 

In The Odyssey, the demon is substituted by the evil god, Poseidon, who had pursued Odysseus relentlessly, and who goes off to Ethiopia, “the farthest limits of mankind”.

 

Another subtlety – the archangel’s use of the word “suppose” (Tobit 6:17): ‘You will save [Sarah], and she will go with you, and I suppose [πολαμβάνω] that you will have children by her’.

Why does he say that?

Because, while he knows that Tobias and Sarah are, indeed, going to have children, many of them, he likewise knows that Tobias and Sarah, as Job and his wife, will tragically lose ten of them in one instant (Job 1:19).

 

The later Tobias-Job

 

Tobias-Job, as an old man, a prophet, still living at the time of the Medo-Persians, when the second Temple was nearing completion, and here under his Akkadian name, Habakkuk, will again be visited by he whom he had called in the Book of Job (16:19) his ‘witness … in heaven’, and his ‘advocate … on high’, surely the archangel Raphael.

 

The angel wants him to take food to Daniel, languishing in the den of lions in Babylon.

 

Once again, he who had a long time ago declared (Tobit 5:2): ‘…. I don’t know how to get to Media’, will now, as an old man, say to the angel: ‘Sir, I have never seen Babylon, and I know nothing about the den’. (Daniel 14:35).

 

The resourceful angel, typically, will quickly fix that problem (14:36): “Then the angel of the Lord took him by the crown of his head and carried him by his hair; with the speed of the wind he set him down in Babylon, right over the den”.

 

That’s what clever angels can do.

Was the archangel Raphael lying?

 



The name Azariah means “God has helped” and

Hananiah means “God has shown mercy”.

  

In the Book of Tobit, angel Raphael pretends he is Azariah, the son of Hananiah the elder. Why did the Angel lie? Isn't it a sin to lie? - Catholic Cafe

 Chris Cammarata has well explained the archangel’s resorting to subterfuge:

  

In the Book of Tobit, angel Raphael pretends he is Azariah, the son of Hananiah the elder. Why did the Angel lie? Isn’t it a sin to lie?

 

It is a sin to lie, but the angel isn’t exactly lying. In this situation it’s more like he isn’t revealing the whole truth–at least not yet.

 

The nature of St. Raphael’s mission required that he keep his angelic identity hidden. Other angels in the Old Testament did this as well. Angels are fearful, powerful, and glorious creatures–that’s why they often begin their messages with “do not be afraid!” Masking their angelic nature serves a practical purpose–and it also emphasizes that God is the one who deserves the glory, not the angel.

 

The reason St. Raphael gives the name Azariah to Tobit in the first place is because he urges the angel to tell him where he is from.  So Raphael gets around it with a funny trick: he gives Tobit and Tobiah the name “Azariah, son of Hananiah.” The name Azariah means “God has helped” and Hananiah means “God has shown mercy.” So basically Raphael is disguising his identity while at the same time secretly hinting at it–his whole mission, as revealed at the end of the story, began because Raphael brought their family’s prayer before the Lord and so was sent to help them (see Tobit 12:11-20). He calls himself a “kinsman” and an “Israelite” as a way of showing that they belong to the same spiritual family–the people of God.

 

So you can sort of think of Azariah as the angel’s “codename” for the mission!

 

And just to clear up any confusion on lying, the Catechism notes that “the right to the communication of the truth is not unconditional” (CCC 2488). We have to judge in particular situations whether it is the right time and circumstance to reveal the truth. Being truthful requires prudence, too. Also, “no one is bound to reveal the truth to someone who does not have the right to know it” (CCC 2489). In the case of St. Raphael, Tobit and his family didn’t have the right to know his true identity–but in the end, he reveals it to them to “declare the works of God with due honor” (Tobit 12:11).The irony in the story of Tobit is that when St. Raphael first enters Tobit’s house and greets him, he tells him: “Take courage! God’s healing is near; so take courage” (Tobit 5:10). What does the name Raphael mean? “God’s healing” (or “God heals”)!

 

 

Sunday, June 14, 2026

Book of Tobit provides template for the geography of Job-Tobias

 



by

Damien F. Mackey

  

However, apart from the seeming advantages – but also the difficulties,

e.g. the “midway” factor – the Book of Tobit gives no indication whatsoever that Tobias had dwelt anywhere other than Nineveh, for the duration of his long life, except that he had headed to Ecbatana in Media after the death of his parents,

where he had lived out the remainder of his life (Tobit 14:12-15).

 

  

1.     Born in the land of Naphtali

 

If Tobit 1 is following a strict chronological sequence, then young Tobias was born in Naphtali shortly prior to the tribe’s captivity by Shalmaneser ‘the Great’ (who is my Tiglath-pileser, cf. 2 Kings 15:29). Thus Tobit tells in his Autobiography (1:9-10): “When I became a man I married Anna, a member of our family, and by her I became the father of Tobias. Now when I was carried away captive to Nineveh …”.

 

Tobias, who is my Job, may have been too young to have recalled much of this. 

 

2.    He travels to Media

 

Tobias, now a young man, and of marriageable age, will embark upon a journey to Ecbatana in Media, in obedience to his recently blinded father, and despite his apparent nervousness (5:2): ‘…. I don’t know how to get to Media’.

 

The Book of Tobit will not only determine the geography of the prophet Job (presuming that I am right in identifying Job as Tobias), but it also radically corrects the conventional geography.

For Ecbatana in Media, far from being to the east of Nineveh, as we all have thought, is actually to be found to be westwards of Nineveh, with Charan (Haran) said to be “in the midway” (Tobit 11:1) between Nineveh and Ecbatana.

 

This has prompted me, after much trial and error, to re-locate Ecbatana in Media to Adana (Adanya) in Cilicia, perfectly situated with Haran “midway” between Adana/ Adanya and Nineveh (see map).

 

And Richard Erickson has demonstrated, quite independently of all of this, that Elam and Media were, indeed, situated in Anatolia:

 

A PROBLEM IN CHALDAEAN AND ELAMITE GEOGRAPHY

 

(8) A PROBLEM IN CHALDAEAN AND ELAMITE GEOGRAPHY

 

3.    Job’s land of Uz

 

A BIG correction now needed:

 

I, in order, to ‘save’ the western movement of the travelling party: from Nineveh to the Tigris River to Haran to Ecbatana in Media, had eagerly latched on to the Heb. Londinii version of the Book of Tobit according to which the party’s destination was, in fact, “Bathania” in “Midian”. For a long time I was happy with this as being the resolution to the apparent difficulty of a journey to Media (supposedly east) of Nineveh, actually heading westwards.

This had a further seeming advantage of enabling Tobias, as Job, eventually to dwell in Bathania (Bashan), in the fertile Hauran region – {adjacent to the original home of Naphtali} - thought to be Ausitis, that is, Uz, where very strong traditions locate the home of Job.

 

However, apart from the seeming advantages – but also the difficulties, e.g. geographically, the “midway” factor – the Book of Tobit gives no indication whatsoever that Tobias had dwelt anywhere other than Nineveh, for the duration of his long life, except that he had headed to Ecbatana in Media after the death of his parents, where he lived out the remainder of his life (Tobit 14:12-15, GNB):

 

Then Tobias and his wife moved to Ecbatana in Media, where they lived with Raguel, Tobias' father-in-law. Tobias took care of Edna and Raguel in their old age and showed them great respect. When at last they died, he buried them at Ecbatana. Tobias inherited Raguel's estate, as he had inherited the estate of his father Tobit. At the ripe old age of 117, Tobias died, having lived long enough to hear about the destruction of Nineveh and to see King Cyaxares of Media take the people away as captives. Tobias praised God for the way that he had punished the people of Nineveh and Assyria. As long as he lived he gave thanks for what God had done to Nineveh.

 

{There appears to be some confusion concerning the actual age of the prophet, Tobias,

at death, 117 years given here, with other versions of Tobit differing from that

(e.g. 127 years), and with 140 years given in the Book of Job (42:16)}.

 

The Tobit narrative, in one fell swoop, renders entirely irrelevant the identification of Bashan/Hauran (Ausitis), as Job’s “the land of Uz … of the East”, which region has figured most prominently in previous Jobian reconstructions of mine.

 

It also seems to put paid to those traditions, albeit strong (e.g. The Testament of Job) that the prophet had ruled as a king (governor) of Egypt.

 

It would now seem inevitable that Job’s “land of Uz”, his East, was much further away from Israel (than Transjordanian Bashan), in Assyria, and that that is where his trials must have occurred. That “Uz”, in this case, could not refer to the traditional Uz, say, of Jeremiah (Lamentations 4:21), “… daughter of Edom, who dwells in the land of Uz”, suggesting a possible connection or proximity to Edom, south of Israel.

South is not East.

 

Can Uz be an actual outlying ‘suburb’ of Nineveh, say Alquš?

UZ = [Alq]-UŠ.

 

            Nahum and the Alquš (Alqosh) factor

 

A complicating geographical factor for me, when writing my article:

 

A north and south geography for the major prophet Isaiah

 

(8) A north and south geography for the major prophet Isaiah

 

had been the prophet Nahum’s home (Nahum 1:1): “A prophecy concerning Nineveh. The book of the vision of Nahum the Elkoshite”. 

 

Nahum, I had identified with Jonah, following the Book of Tobit’s (14:4) interchanging “Nahum” (GNT) and “Jonah” (WEB). But Nahum was also the great prophet Isaiah. This, however, was leading me into geographical complications, e.g. with Nahum being connected to Elkosh (“the Elcesite”).

 

It has long been suggested that this Elkosh was, in fact, Alqosh in Assyria.

 

Alqosh

Town 40 km. north of Mosul in Iraq. Seat of a Chald. bishopric. It now numbers around 5,000 inhabitants. Many families and individuals migrated from Alqosh to larger Iraqi cities (Mosul, Baghdad, etc.) or abroad, especially to the USA and UK. The town’s economy is based on agriculture (wheat, barley, chickpeas, lentils, beans, cucumbers, gourds, melons, grapes, and figs) and animal husbandry (sheep and goats). Traditional trades included weaving and dying cloth. Alqosh is a major spiritual center. Jews used to go on pilgrimage to the tomb believed to be that of the prophet Nahum, who, according to an interpretation of Nah 1.1, may have come from Alqosh.

Two important E.-Syr. monasteries lie close to Alqosh: the Monastery of Rabban Hormizd, founded in the 7th   cent., used to be one of the patriarchal residences of the Ch. of E., later moved to Mosul, then Baghdad, and the more recent Monastery of the Virgin, also known as the Lower Monastery or of Our Lady of the Seeds. From the 16th cent. the cultural life of the village flourished thanks to the so-called School of Alqosh. Alqosh was pillaged several times, by Murād Bey (Bar Yak) in 1508, the Pasha of ʿAmadiyya in 1740, the Persians in 1743. People sought refuge on the mountain, in the Monastery of Rabban Hormizd, but there were rapes and casualties. Around the mid-16th cent. some of the population supported Yoannan Sullaqa, the first Chald. patr. elected with official approval of Rome. In 1767, around 100 of the 500 families were Catholic. Literary sources and annotations made by European travelers record recurrent cases of pestilence and famine, caused by draught or locusts, which devastated the region during the 19th cent. In 1832 and 1842 the village was attacked and pillaged by Kurds.

 

Obviously, Nahum in his various guises (Isaiah, Jonah) could not have originated from the Assyrian Alqosh. But he could have, as the prophet Jonah, dwelt there for a period of time during his Nineveh campaign, perhaps writing his book there, and thus being known for that period of time as an “Elcesite” (Alqoshite).

 

It would have been fitting for Jonah to have spent some time with his beloved Israelite people, exiled in Nineveh.

Obviously Tobit knew of him, having made reference to Jonah/Nahum in 14:4.

And it would not be surprising if Jonah had dwelt with, or close to, this Tobit family, presumably in Uz/Alquš.

 

I had this well in mind when I wrote towards the end of my article, “A north and south geography for the major prophet Isaiah”:

 

However, in a future article, perhaps, I may entertain the possibility that Elkosh was actually the Alqosh in Assyria, near Nineveh, and that that is where Isaiah, as Jonah-Nahum, would sojourn for a time during his mission to Nineveh. 

 

There may be a further clue.

When young Tobias (Job) was returning with his new wife, Sarah, the angel Raphael (and the dog), from Ecbatana (to Haran) to Nineveh, an unknown place called Kaserin is mentioned in close proximity to Nineveh (Tobit 11:1): “As they neared Kaserin, which is close to Nineveh …”.

 

This, I now suggest, was the family’s actual place of abode at Nineveh, nearby Kaserin, Alqoš (Kas- Qosh). It may be the much sought after Jobian “land of Uz”.

 

            Comparisons of Uz and Alqosh

 

While much work can now be done on drawing comparisons between Assyrian Alqosh and Job’s “land of Uz”, I can immediately see, at least, a few obvious similarities.

 

Firstly, no one could doubt that it was to the east of the Holy Land.

 

And the above description of the town’s economy fits well with the livelihood of Job and his family:

 

The town’s economy is based on agriculture (wheat, barley, chickpeas, lentils, beans, cucumbers, gourds, melons, grapes, and figs) and animal husbandry (sheep and goats).

 

It also appears to have an abundance of caves, a feature, too, of the Book of Job (30:6).

 

 

Feasts of the Sacred Heart of Jesus

and the Immaculate Heart of Mary

 

12-13thth June, 2026

 

 

 

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

Job’s ‘Behemoth’ and the wrong end of an elephant

 

 


by

Damien F. Mackey

 

 

 

“Look at Behemoth,
    which I made along with you
    and which feeds on grass like an ox.

What strength it has in its loins,
    what power in the muscles of its belly!

 

Its tail sways like a cedar;
    the sinews of its thighs are close-knit.

Its bones are tubes of bronze,
    its limbs like rods of iron.

It ranks first among the works of God,
    yet its Maker can approach it with his sword.

 

The hills bring it their produce,
    and all the wild animals play nearby.

 

Under the lotus plants it lies,
    hidden among the reeds in the marsh.

 

The lotuses conceal it in their shadow;
    the poplars by the stream surround it.

A raging river does not alarm it;
    it is secure, though the Jordan should surge against its mouth.

 

Can anyone capture it by the eyes,
    or trap it and pierce its nose?”

 

Job 40:15-24

 

 

 

Was ‘Behemoth’ a Dinosaur?

 

Favouring this theory, for those, who think that Job dated right back to the Ice Ages, or to the early patriarchal times, is the fact that, whereas common candidates for the Book of Job’s ‘Behemoth’ - say, the elephant or the hippo - have insignificant piggy-like tails, ‘Behemoth’ has a tail to recall the impressive Cedar of Lebanon (Job 40:17): “Its tail sways like a cedar …”.  

 

Some Creationists, for instance, think that a dinosaur was probably intended here.

Wayne Jackson, for example, referring to Creationist Dr. Henry Morris (d. 2006), will ask the question: “Why do you suppose that a dinosaur is rarely proposed as a candidate for behemoth?”

https://www.christiancourier.com/articles/1007-job-behemoth-and-dinosaurs

 

Dinosaur

 

Why do you suppose that a dinosaur is rarely proposed as a candidate for behemoth? The answer is very simple. As noted earlier, the common perception is that dinosaurs became extinct long before man arrived upon this planet (approximately 65 million years, it is alleged). Accordingly, behemoth simply could not be a variety of dinosaur — because the chronological disparity prohibits such. Dr. Henry Morris has addressed the matter in this fashion.

 

“Modern Bible scholars, for the most part, have become so conditioned to think in terms of the long ages of evolutionary geology that it never occurs to them that mankind once lived in the same world with the great animals that are now found only as fossils” (p. 115).

 

As we have demonstrated already, there is unequivocal biblical testimony that human beings and dinosaurs inhabited the same early environment of the earth, and there is not a shred of scientific evidence that proves otherwise. ….

 

And Mart-Jan Paul, in “Behemoth and leviathan in the book of Job”, asking, “What, then, was behemoth?”, will suggest that it may have been a now extinct apatosaur, or something akin to it: 

https://creation.com/behemoth-and-leviathan

 

What, then, was behemoth?

 

If we take extinct animals into consideration, a herbivorous dinosaur seems a more likely candidate. The apatosaur had a large tail, lived on green plants and weighed about 30 tonnes.

The ultrasaur could reach a height of 18 m and a length of 30 m, with a weight of 136 tonnes. It also was a herbivore with an enormous tail. The brachiosaur was 12 m tall, 23 m long and 60 to 70 tonnes in weight. Its tail could reach a length of nearly 6 m and a breadth of nearly 1.5 m. In the sauropods, large bundles of muscles are visible on the outside of the body of the animal. Behemoth is not only a herbivore, but more specifically it is a grass-eater. An animal that does fit this aspect is the 15 m long nigersaur, found in the Republic of Niger in Africa. ….

 

Because new kinds of extinct animals continue to be found in our time, and because the description in Job 40 is not specific enough, we cannot identify precisely which animal is described. Neither do we know whether the above-mentioned animals still lived in the time of Job, but it is useful for our exegesis to include such examples. ….

[End of quotes]

 

Allan Steel has, for his part, written an entire article on the subject, “Could Behemoth Have Been a Dinosaur?”: 

https://answersingenesis.org/dinosaurs/could-behemoth-have-been-a-dinosaur/ 

in which he concludes:

 

…. The whole passage in Job 40 concerning Behemoth certainly suggests a large animal, and no known living animal fits the passage adequately (for various reasons, including the detailed habitat presented).

 

The most natural interpretation of the key clause Job 40:17 … is that the tail of Behemoth is compared to a cedar for its great size, and there is nothing in the context which contradicts this possibility, even though the exact sense of the verb is extremely difficult to determine.

 

Consequently, the most reasonable interpretation (which also takes the whole passage into account) is that Behemoth was a large animal, now extinct, which had a large tail. Thus some type of extinct dinosaur should still be considered a perfectly reasonable possibility according to our present state of knowledge. ….

 

[End of quote]

 

These are all good, laudable attempts to make sense of ‘Behemoth’ in the Book of Job.

Given the pattern of the Book of Job, in which the Lord is holding up for Job’s consideration real animals (mountain goat, donkey, ox, horse, eagle, rooster, ibis, etc.), these attempts are far preferable, I think, to those that would attempt to make of Job’s

Behemoth’ and ‘Leviathan’ either mythical creatures, or demons.

 

I, however, have my own reasons – hopefully also good ones – for rejecting dinosaurs from the category of animals in the Book of Job.

 

For one, the:

 

Prophet Job did not belong to the Patriarchal or Judges era

 

(15) Prophet Job did not belong to the Patriarchal or Judges era

 

nor was he king Jobab:

 

Prophet Job was not the ancient Edomite, Jobab

 

(15) Prophet Job was not the ancient Edomite, Jobab

 

but lived much later than that - a good half a millennium later than that!

 

For Job was Tobias, son of Tobit, of the neo-Assyrian captivity:

 

Historical Era of the Prophet Job

 

(15) Historical Era of the Prophet Job

 

That, I think, puts paid to dinosaurs.

 

Was ‘Behemoth’ an Elephant?

 

And, secondly, I think that, by ‘’Behemoth’, the Book of Job is clearly (in hindsight) intending the elephant, an animal that is a popular choice for ‘Behemoth’ except for the mingy tail factor.

 

But I think that we may have the elephant the wrong way around.

 

Job 40:17 is not, I suggest, referring to the animal’s unimpressive posterius (tail), but, rather, to his highly impressive proboscis, swaying like a cedar.

Even looking somewhat like a cedar.